Home » Posts tagged "law"

Gunter Zielinskis

Steuerberater Gunter Zielinski informed when money stops the friendship.” This proverb is repeatedly confirmed by the experience of experienced tax consultant and senior lecturers for the celebrities, University of London, Gunter Zielinski. It is a concern, combative and rationally to enforce the interests of his clients before the tax authorities the experts for conflicts between taxpayers and tax authorities. Trigger of the disputes between taxpayers and tax authorities are often notices and injunctions. Unexpected payments and repayments are for many rated heavy duty which have existential effect under certain circumstances. You feel unfairly treated and respond with some extreme opposition to the tax authorities and their officials. Communicating their concerns to the employees of tax agencies is quickly dominated by these emotions.

The negative, possibly pejorative interviewing solves now in turn on the financial administration Aversions against the concerned taxpayers out. Is the Foundation of personal-led conflict and the rapidly escalating situation runs the risk of shut down. The use of Gunter Zielinskis militant representing his clients is able to avoid deadlock situations of conflict in a rational way, or to resolve. After a precise analysis of present tax facts he recorded conversations with the relevant tax office to accurately install the arguments of the taxpayer in a factually-run dispute. As a technical expert in tax matters, Gunter Zielinski takes the necessary acceptance, to engage on the same level with the State institution for his clients. Its aims, to de-escalate the conflict situation, to solve tax problems objectively and to enforce the concerns of his clients. The rational solution of a dispute allows all parties to overcome the unpleasant disputes and to use their energies more productively.

This perspective is not sufficient to settle the conflict, there is no way a formal dispute with the tax authorities. Gunter Zielinski says his clients even forcibly commitment to the side when it comes to opposition proceedings, proceedings before the competent jurisdiction and revisions. This path may be unpleasant to the conflicts with the financial management out of the way, without to consult experts, is often wrong. Representative statistics come to the conclusion that about forty percent of all decisions and orders of the Treasury is incorrect, usually to the detriment of taxable persons. Expert knowledge and combative commitment are important, to implement effectively the legitimate interests of taxpayers.

Multiple Donations

Treasury must former error correct the personal allowance graduated according to the degree of kinship in inheritances and donations can be used only once in ten years. Moreover, gifts and discounts are summed up within this period, achieving no tariff reduction on fractional gifts. This regulation was already before the introduction of inheritance tax reform sheep and also continues to apply. The donations with the control value at the time of the individual transfers are summed up in the aggregation of purchases within the ten year period. This means that when a House is transferred before 2009 the then cheap tax value also continue applies when this gift with a gift of money together will meet in 2009. On the sum of the values in the date of the transfer the tax is then calculated, which may lead to a higher progression as a whole. The previously paid gift tax will be applied to the later fixed amount so that the result is no longer pay as at a single grant in one day. The Bundesfinanzhof (BFH) decided now, as the later such tax on the previous purchases to calculate.

It is the assessment to be considered, to assess at that time for more accurate assessment of the material and legal situation for these purchases as they would have been (AZ. II R 55/08). If at that time there were a failed tax statement or the IRS is assumed by other conditions, this may now still be corrected. This is true even if the original gift expensive decision become already definitive and no error correction actually allows more according to the top judge of German financial is. In the underlying judgment, the gift tax was set in 1997 on a televised farm mistakenly with around 1,000 euros. But just 200 euros would have been correct.

However, the farmer had paid the higher amount and the decision was final. In a further anticipated succession fell five years later the IRS This error on. Therefore, the authority reckoned in just the correct amount of 200 euros on the new tax, although the purchaser actually had pay was approximately five times. The wrong excessive tax bill remained. The Federal fiscal court based on this–that the tax bills issued for the prior purchases would have no binding effect for the following bequests or donations. Due to this ruling families should so not too soon rejoice when a gift of expensive communication has a too low amount. That can be ten years, unless an additional grant to the same person here. More on this and similar topics interested in the information service of taxpayers-tip will find”.